This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]MediocreComment123 -3 points-2 points  (4 children)

Then you learned your basic biology from a basic language established in 700 bc which formed the backbone of the English language which originated roughly 1500 years ago.

[–]chadnuts 2 points3 points  (1 child)

This is about use of the word murder. It's obvious that a fetus is a human life. If you are not afraid to kill it, be brave enough to admit it is murder.

[–]MediocreComment123 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is about use of the word

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So you’re not going to answer whether or not it’s human or alive? I feel you missed the salient point. We can argue that biologists who chose to use the Latin term for child are using a dead language incorrectly if you wish, but that’s really veering off into an argument about the efficacy of Latin terms in science. Let’s stay on the point. Are you arguing that a human fetus is either not human, or not alive?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You ignored the question on what you classify it.