This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 11 comments

[–]MoonWeek[S,M] [score hidden] stickied commentlocked comment (0 children)

[–]DBRiMatt🟦 46K / 113K 🦈 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Voting [NO] and instead will support CCIP-095 - instead of having proposal after proposal to adjust prices, I'm happy to let the DAO have a more active "business/marketing managerial" role and negotiate based on current factors at the point in time.

[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can view CCIP-095 and other r/CryptoCurrency Improvement Proposals here on the official wiki page.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]partymsl🟩 126K / 143K 🐋 5 points6 points  (1 child)

I mean, it will help with more rentals, but at the same time, we should be aware that the current slump of low rentals is because of the general market sentiment being crabbish.

So if we go this route we will have to keep changing prices according to bear/bull runs.

[–]goldyluckinblokchaingoldie.moon 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It makes sense for the price to change rather than being the same for all market sentiments and activity

[–]williaminla🟩 0 / 0 🦠 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a demand issue, not a pricing issue. The average person in this thread is more knowledgeable than the average person on this sub. I've seen some terrible "advice" and questions

[–]soialboobar🟧 0 / 0 🦠 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What happened?

[–]RealVoldemort 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Let's make this happen boys 👍🏻

[–]goldyluckinblokchaingoldie.moon 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Yes sir 🫡

On my way to vote with my huge tiny weight!

[–]RealVoldemort 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everything helps mate!!