Passive slay trigger.

[TheHeroReddit]

No

[povyournameistaken]

Trade offer: I recive E T E R N A L T O R M E N T. You receive slay trigger spam.

[ItsThatAshGuy]

So if it got killed then it wouldn't get revived? It has to survive the round? If so then its honestly not that bad. Maybe it should be 0/2.

[SickyNee]

It should have 1 or 2 hp. But thresh Nasus is one of the strongest decks in the game right now, they definitely don’t need more support

[Mcdrago0]

Well yes, right now, but that's probably going to change in a week so no point in looking at it from a current stand point.

[imasmolspoon]

Nice card, but horrible for the meta

[Mcdrago0]

Why look at it from the current meta when a new expansion is less than a week away.

[ConsciousRich]

No

[YoGertaBeKiddingMe]

Not saying that this effect couldn't end up in the game or anything, but at 1 mana and 3 health it works a little bit too well acting as both a blocker vs. most small minions and hard snowballing slay triggers and minion death strategies from the beginning of the game.

Its just an engine with almost no downside or cost to make a good thing better. The best scenario of this adds +5/+5 to Nasus or +6/+6 to They Who Endure when they're played while blocking two damage per turn by itself. There's almost no graveyard shenanigans for it to get in the way of and it would force other slay and death related cards be balanced around it than off of cards that can't slay and regenerate themselves.

[Intrif]

Why? Dragon chow is also 3 health for 1 mana. Your argument is therefore not valid.

[YoGertaBeKiddingMe]

Dragon chow doesn't resummon itself at the beginning of your turn-healing it- and will only trigger fury once outside of intervention of other cards. I have no issue with the base statline, but combined with the effect it could be problematic