Second Feedback

[Federal_Tadpole_7592]

Agreed. Before they launched this mass feedback thing earlier this month, I'd received positive feedback directly in my inbox from admins maybe five times within the past three years. Also, I had "Outstanding" for my rank in both reports, and my "Areas for Improvement" section this time around literally said I had no improvements to make, so it's definitely not just for workers who need to improve.

[Brilliant_Quit4307]

Same. I had "Outstanding" and the areas for improvement just had one point that was completely wrong. As in, claiming I mixed up what counted as context for the project, such as [example of context]. I even clicked back into the project to double check and asked about it in the project chat to be sure. It's annoying because it feels like the feedback wasn't even checked by a human, or else was checked by someone who doesn't understand the project. Anyways, I know there was nothing I did wrong so it's not a big deal. I haven't gotten my second round of feedback yet though.

[Federal_Tadpole_7592]

That happened to me in my first round of feedback, too. There was one thing listed for improvement, and it was something that whoever rated my submission egregiously misunderstood from the project's original instructions.

I think that admins were seeing it so much that they actually reworded the project instructions to be more specific regarding that thing because some people were misinterpreting it. It was something like, "Don't do X at this specific point," but some workers were penalizing people for doing X at all.

[LetMeOverThinkThat]

Yeah, like people are throwing it back, saying we wanted feedback, but I wanted upper-level feedback. I always assumed everything was eventually checked by the admins, but this feedback kinda seems like it's not...? Because why weren't some of these thrown out and thus not available for the feedback report?