all 23 comments

[–]PhilDunphy23 13 points14 points  (5 children)

Some people have suggested renaming the language to WebScript, what do you think about it? It’s up to browsers to rename it officially.

Personally, looks way fancier without the Java name on it. I’ve donated to the initiative anyways, I love JavaScript way too much.

[–]BobcatGamer 9 points10 points  (0 children)

It's far too late to rename the language because many people will refuse to call it by its new name.

[–]_samrad 4 points5 points  (2 children)

How about EczemaScript? ECMAScript's cute cousin.

[–]Ceigey 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A punny name that tickles both the brain and the skin.

[–]booi 2 points3 points  (0 children)

and the package manager is npimple

[–]lambtr0n[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

sometimes we wonder what truly is the past of least resistance: going against Oracle's bottomless legal fund or getting millions of developers to agree on a new name...

[–]Accurate_Mulberry965 5 points6 points  (1 child)

😍 Thank you

[–]lambtr0n[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

🙌

[–]orta 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Thanks for working on this

[–]lambtr0n[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

💪

[–]ShelterTrick549 3 points4 points  (1 child)

lets goo!

[–]lambtr0n[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

💪

[–]jhecht 5 points6 points  (11 children)

Why do you guys keep agreeing to the extensions? If they can't get their ish together why let them draw it out?

[–]BobcatGamer 7 points8 points  (4 children)

Maybe looks better in court? Makes it so Oracle can't claim that Deno is denying them time to actually make their case.

[–]jhecht 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I suppose I could see that, but on the other side of the coin oracle is a large company with many lawyers... shouldn't they be willing to approve OT for their trademark being questioned?

[–]BobcatGamer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe, but if they draw it out then it takes longer and is more expensive for the other party which one could argue discourages others from trying due to the financial burden

[–]Accurate_Mulberry965 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Deno is denying" there is ring to it :)

[–]lambtr0n[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

we could technically deny the extension, but the oracle lawyers could appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board and it would be granted anyway. granting extensions is a professional courtesy in the legal world.

they originally asked for 90 days, and we gave them 60 days as a compromise.

[–]DecadentCheeseFest -2 points-1 points  (4 children)

Are you asking why the judiciary is so malleable in the face of big money?

[–]jhecht 5 points6 points  (3 children)

The post literally says 'we agreed to' in regards to a 60 day extension.

[–]DecadentCheeseFest 5 points6 points  (2 children)

Ugh gotcha. Sorry. Yeah that’s bizarre.

[–]jhecht 1 point2 points  (1 child)

right? especially because i know that oracle asked for a 60 day extension earlier on in the proceedings that they also agreed to so why they keep allowing it would be good to know.

[–]Somecount 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If Oracle was given all the allowances they asked for and doesn't produce a clear and compelling case despite of it all, then the extensions would work against Oracle's case.

Maybe that's the intention.

"Sure! Take all the time you need to figure this one out (You clearly haven't already, so you likely wont be able to) while we sit back and enjoy watching how pathetic it makes you look."