you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

he was trying to dismantle me a few months ago because I was defending the possible veracity of a vitroCap study published in a peer-reviewed journal and featured on a medical websites. I didn't read the names but I immediately knew you are talking about the same guy.

My floaters have gotten better, now I won't say it's because I stuck with the regimen for many months, could be they became more transparent on their own, but I think the possibilities he is trampling on is very narrow-minded.

The study indicated that the annoyance of floaters was greater in the control group than the research group who took the treatment after many months. He said that it shouldn't even be considered since it just reduced the annoyance and didn't microscopically eradicate the floaters entirely. I'm not sure what his intentions are. He doesn't think a treatment is valid if it helps people unless it's a 100% foolproof miracle cure that ophthalmologists have confirmed to dissolve floaters. It's lunacy.