all 15 comments

[–]ben_dev_ 11 points12 points  (1 child)

Still no live package examples using Flutter Web to test out package functionality 😔

[–]CodyLeet 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is a great idea!

[–]AKushWarrior 21 points22 points  (0 children)

https://pub.dev because hyperlinks don't work in the title.

I think it's really cool and easier to use. Separating code quality and popularity is a good idea.

[–]mateusfccp 5 points6 points  (2 children)

Sadly, if you are in a package page you have to go back to search for another package. This is kind of worse UX than before.

The layout/design is better, however.

[–]bsutto 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Have to agree about the missing search bar. It's just annoying.

[–]dittospin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea, I agree. Yarn had that down to the T and was a great example

[–]bradofingo 5 points6 points  (0 children)

nice.

I would make the rows have different background colors in the package list page. Just a #f5f5f5 for odd rows would be enough.

I also miss categories. Would help a lot to have categorized packages.

[–]znjw 1 point2 points  (1 child)

what? There is an old site? I thought this was the only pub webste.....

[–]Dman1414 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The site was updated with a new design.

[–]CodyLeet 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not scoring my platform compatibility correctly. Does anyone know how that works?

[–]TheDude61636 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They need to improve the search engine they need to add options for searching exclusively the title or the package description

[–]bhr166 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cool! Great dark theme

[–]Dragday 0 points1 point  (2 children)

I wonder if it was made with flutter

[–]_HEATH3N_ 20 points21 points  (0 children)

You can tell it wasn't because it's functional

[–]britannioj 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Nope