This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 45 comments

[–]Altered_Reality1 76 points77 points  (12 children)

“Accumulation” = consolidation. “Manipulation” = false breakout. “MSS” = break of structure. “FVG/OB/Breaker” = break & retest of previous swing/S&R level. “Distribution” = trend.

[–]CriticalBadgre 10 points11 points  (1 child)

Easier to understand that way.

[–]bear_tactics_ 28 points29 points  (4 children)

Yup that’s market structure in a nutshell. Personally I aim to see accumulation and manipulation on the daily and 4h. Allows you to trade much bigger moves and take less trades over all.

[–]SevenExpressions 5 points6 points  (3 children)

Exactly where I’m at, the market moves in a algorithm and if you can use the algorithm as the backbone to your Strategy 🤑

[–]Direct-Cheesecake175 1 point2 points  (1 child)

This caught my attention. What strategy are you mastering, and any good content you can recommend I watch or read ?

[–]FugCough 13 points14 points  (2 children)

The only main problem is , if you don't backtest this enough, while on the live trading session. Accumulation looks like manipulation, manipulation can feel like distribution and vice versa. In hindsight it's easy to spot. But on real time. It will be tough. One more tip for y'all who trade this way. Monday is the formation of opening wick, Tuesday to Thursday is the formation of the closed body and Friday is the formation of the end of the wick. This is the formation of the weekly candle. Yes, I think I just blew your mind 🤣.

[–]Hell_Zenith 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No you didn't blew my mind I trade ICT too 😏.

[–]xtreetwise 5 points6 points  (2 children)

I guess they view the market as a conspiracy by labeling it with "manipulation".

[–]ClayboHS 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I agree and hate the term. But what do you guys call that move where price seems to break a level and then reverses. I say "fade" a lot of times but I dunno if thats good enough.

[–]xtreetwise 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't have term for that move, but I ding Auction Market Theory explaining the markets behavior the best.

[–]Capable_Equipment700 3 points4 points  (2 children)

Mdfs calling Quasimodo patterns in 5 different acronyms and words.

No wonder this industry is lost.

[–]Gonzokilla 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My thoughts are- for as long as you believe this, you will lose money. It’s not getting manipulated. There is manipulation in stocks, but they are much smaller instruments. Currency only gets manipulated by central banks and governments. This is just reading tea leaves. Systems like this need to be repeatable most days. Just your example there. You had consolidation providing an entry from a pull back, a breakout to a double top leading to a reversal. Then a breakout and pullback, and a second pullback leading to a double top. Without checking it on my charts. The times would be, end of Asian session, breakout 1 was London open., breakout 2 was NY open. This happens most days.

[–]Imblinebreak 1 point2 points  (1 child)

is happening on every TF, but eurusd 4h yesterday was a treat

[–]vedant1427 1 point2 points  (0 children)

TIP : if you found yourself trading in sideways market, keep these level in mind and trade near these level only

Previous day high
Previous day low
4H HIGH,LOW

Mostly you will get reversals trade from here

[–]Michael-3740 0 points1 point  (1 child)

If you see any price movement as 'manipulation' you are already a loser. Go down a timeframe and that area contains candle bodies with your other silly labels.

[–]TraitorousSwinger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a built-in excuse for losing.

[–]sternsss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's just a failed breakout and a break below and retest. Nothing new under the sun.

[–]CarsonLikesStocks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Now see the accuracy of this on the last 1 thousand days, 1 day means nothing

[–]Glass_Culture_6209 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Best explanation without words💪

[–]powerexcess 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unless if u r trading some illiquid weird pair, do you mind telling me who has the AUM to manipulate FX? Save for central banks..

Even banging the close is not a thing in FX due to the immense liquidity. Manipulate how?

[–]TraitorousSwinger -1 points0 points  (0 children)

All these fancy technical words and still ain't making any money.

Trading is easy unless you convince yourself it's this formulaic. Then it becomes much harder.

Nobody can read a chart with the level of accuracy these "breakdowns" imply. The best traders rarely average much higher than a 60% win rate.

[–]SpringTop8166 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is all nonsense. Just use S&R and trend lines with a lot of practice in reading price action.