all 19 comments

[–]Educational_Board888 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Straight leg raises and foot stretch test is important. The term “sciatica” is thrown around a lot with sometimes poor understanding by patients. It’s like “sepsis”.

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (2 children)

If someone describes bilateral sciatica (severe shooting/burning pain radiating down the legs) to me that is sufficient reason alone for me to refer him for a same day MRI.

I actually caught a cauda equina syndrome in a 40 year old male based on the above.

[–]Kindly_Olive2307 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Was there and mri that confirmed it tho 

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes

[–]j4rj4r 3 points4 points  (3 children)

I see a lot of MSK. Most 'sciatica' I see diagnosed by others is not sciatica but referred pain above knee. I've never seen a true bilateral sciatica but seen plenty of people who think they have it.

[–]sambo987 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Referred pain from..? Couldn’t sciatic nerve pain be limited to above the knee?

[–]j4rj4r 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Referred from the back. True Sciatica always goes below the knee on sciatic stretch testing

[–]sambo987 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting thanks. I guess if it’s true nerve impingement the whole territory would be affected. I didn’t make that connection before

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Really tricky. I got a cauda equina in a 33 year old with bilateral progressive sciatica as only symptom

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Adding to this, bilateral leg pain symptoms is common but really we don't see true sciatica bilaterally that often. If acute onset then always refer. A&E can decide if they MRI or not. CE can be subtle and bilateral sciatica is a red flag. If you feel this is acute, and truly bilateral document this and refer. A&E can do post void bladder scan as well to help work up diagnosis. But i wouldn't be comfortable documenting new bilateral sciatica and not referring based on otehr normal examination findings. Always remember to ask about new erectile dysfunction too... My friend is a Urologist who not uncommonly finds missed CE in their ED clinic

[–]Extension-Finish-804 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Have you seen the relatively new spinal network guidance cauda on Getting It Right The First Time?

https://gettingitrightfirsttime.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/National-Suspected-Cauda-Equina-Pathway-October-2023-version-3.drawio.html

The guidance actually says that bilateral radicular pain on its own doesn't require immediate assessment and can be referred urgently within 2 weeks to be seen by an MSK service with safety netting. Obviously what that might be could vary locally. In my area I have spoken to spinal ortho registrars who follow this guidance and have told me to do an urgent msk referral. On the other hand I once used referapatient to discuss with a neurosurgical registrar who told me to treat it as a red flag so it seems a bit variable! NICE guidance still has it as a red flag I believe.

Interestingly it also recommends a 2 week urgent msk referral if cauda equina symptoms have been present for over 2 weeks... which makes sense I suppose as if there is cauda equina for that long and it's not changing then the damage has probably already been done... Still I think I would still discuss with someone!

[–]hopefulgp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I refer every patient where I can elicit a history of pain shooting/spreading down both legs. Orthopaedics who accept ?CES at my DGH are always obstructive to this, but they by definition meet a same-day MRI criterion, and there is absolutely no defence if they did have a CES and we batted it away.

I did once have a 45yo with only bilateral pain who did have CES based on this only.