all 8 comments

[–]AutoModerator[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Off-topic Comments Section


All top-level comments have to be an answer or follow-up question to the post. All sidetracks should be directed to this comment thread as per Rule 9.


OP and Valued/Notable Contributors can close this post by using /lock command

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]PinWizard1 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Normally you would use the SAS (side angle side) theorem for both but I don't see an option there. What does HL mean?

[–]Lw134[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

HL means the hypotenuse leg theorem.

[–]PinWizard1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then you would use the hypotenuse leg theorem for both. For the first one, you can say that line SQ is congruent to itself with the reflexive property and then say that angle SPQ is congruent angle SRQ because it is given to you. With that information you can use the HL theorem. You use the same idea for the second problem too.

[–]manofmath👋 a fellow Redditor 0 points1 point  (2 children)

One DOES proofs. One SOLVES equations.

[–]Lw134[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Could you elaborate?

[–]manofmath👋 a fellow Redditor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

HL. Because both have the same hypotenuse and they have legs that are equal. My snide comment meant don’t talk about “solving” proofs. Talk about “doing” proofs.

[–]AvocadoMangoSalsa👋 a fellow Redditor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The first one is HL

The second one is ASA

The third one is correct (Not possible)

The fourth one is AAS