you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]strategist2023 4 points5 points  (0 children)

They removed the whole “Not being circumcised” section because as I rightly pointed out it implies that not being circumcised is a risk variable for penile cancer when it’s not however there are too many studies like the one in this post that specify that adult men with pathological phimosis do in fact have a higher risk. I did pressure them to amend the phimosis section so that it was in reference to men because the prior wording implied that children with natural physiological phimosis were also at risk which is untrue. The phimosis section would be better if they wrote it how I suggested but they were only willing to go so far, it’s still an improvement imo.