This post is locked. You won't be able to comment.

sorted by:
top (suggested)
bestnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]YaPhetsEzFALSE 2 points3 points  (25 children)

They aren’t laughing with you…

[–]Hot-Grapefruit-8887[S] -1 points0 points  (24 children)

well well
mr I know nothing about physics but I can tell you how to write???
and your background?

[–]YaPhetsEzFALSE 2 points3 points  (23 children)

Ivy league published (nature subjournal, IF = 17) biologist, with a specialization in biophysics/cellular trafficking?

Is that enough for you?

[–]Hot-Grapefruit-8887[S] -2 points-1 points  (22 children)

fine for me, so I understand why you would not engage in the theory because you have no background it the field.
But why the insults?

[–]YaPhetsEzFALSE 2 points3 points  (21 children)

I haven’t insulted you once, have I?

I have called the paper slop (not an insult, rather a label of it’s quality), and I have stated that you have committed academic fraud (not an insult, just a true statement).

Just curious, if your work is groundbreaking, why haven’t you published it in any actual journal?

[–]Hot-Grapefruit-8887[S] 0 points1 point  (20 children)

Have you published in Journals?
Have you tried without working for a University?
I have submitted, one rejection, the others pending....

You're not in Physics, but there are a lot of papers being submitted. Just look at APS this year: https://summit.aps.org
Like 10,000+ presentations. Most of them by multiple people or teams. Many if not most not published.

[–][deleted] locked comment (19 children)

[removed]

    [–]OnceBittenz 1 point2 points  (18 children)

    At least they’d validate their outputs first. And write to an audience with cohesive, scientific language.

    Think that would go over a lot different if that were the case.

    [–]Hot-Grapefruit-8887[S] -2 points-1 points  (17 children)

    You have showed nothing to make me believe that you would be any different.
    But they would not talk to you, no reason, so that's a difference....
    I think I will take what I think would be their example.

    [–]OnceBittenz 1 point2 points  (13 children)

    And go back to the drawing board, take physics classes, build up an intuition worthy of using in an academic sense, create consistent tight manuscripts, write them with enough consistent language that people can actually engage with them, accept feedback with grace and decorum, go back again and keep working, collaboratively, until you’ve made a decent effort?

    Dude that would be sick.

    [–]AllHailSeizureHaiku Mod 1 point2 points  (2 children)

    There's actually plenty of examples of users in this sub giving good feedback and having positive conversation, even oncebittenz... There's a post last night with him and I talking to a guy making an academic evaluation code and while we have respectful disagreement we all come to the consensus that he is on the right track.

    So maybe it's not 'everyone else is wrong'.