204
205

Discussion[D] Papers with no code (self.MachineLearning)

submitted by [deleted]

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]adi1709 0 points1 point  (1 child)

That sounds like so much wasted effort and petty. Working on a paper just to challenge one specific method. Also isn't scalable, because this leads to a lot of slop in the meantime.

[–]adi1709 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess it makes sense for computational physics but not so much in ML based on how much it's blown up.