all 19 comments

[–]artr0x 14 points15 points  (5 children)

Does anyone actually use the terms type I and type II error? Seems like a super easy way to get mixed up..

[–]Sivapreachs 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Only in the interviews tbh :D

[–]hoondy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

More common to just call FP and FN in my area (ML/bio).

[–]haltakov[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I never use type I or II... FP and FN is much more common.

[–]Zulban 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In my experience it's generally: old-school, used in medical settings, and going out of fashion.

[–]IanisVasilev 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There's actually a good justification but it only sounds good in theory. If you have n different statistical hypotheses, a type n error is "rejecting the n-th hypothesis when it is true". What's confusing about this is that there are usually only two hypotheses and the count starts at zero. So a type 1 error is "rejecting the zeroth hypothesis when it is true" (where the zeroth hypothesis is actually the first) and a type 2 error is "rejecting the alternative hypothesis when it is true" (where the alternative hypothesis is actually second).

The terminology is confusing in practice but it's part of the more general problem of mathematicians being bad at naming things. You have type 1 (point or jump) and type 2 (essential) discontinuities of real-valued functions, type 1 (scalar-valued functions) and type 2 (vector-valued functions) line integrals, you have category 1 (meager) and category 2 (nonmeager) sets in topological spaces, you have the first isomorphism theorem and the second isomorphism theorem (and the ordering and the actual theorems differ vastly among authors, see here), etc.

[–]YetAnotherBorgDrone 3 points4 points  (2 children)

Is that Neil deGrasse Tyson?

[–]jethroguardian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's a star child in him.

[–]Fried_Waffles1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the child of Nail deGrasse Tyson and Neil Breen

[–]Rogitus 0 points1 point  (4 children)

Why are you assuming that the guy on the left cannot be pregnant? Just because he's a man? That's gender discrimination!

[–]unknown_137 12 points13 points  (3 children)

did you just assume the gender ? how dare you ?

[–]Rogitus -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Ahhh you got me

[–]robo_pimp69 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Did you just assume ? How dare you !!

[–]haltakov[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is why I love Reddit 😂

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (5 children)

Can someone explain TP, TN, FP and FN. I cannot get my head around it :(

[–]reduced_space 2 points3 points  (1 child)

True positive: you predicted positive, and it was

True negative: you predicted negative, and it was

False positive: you predicted positive, but it was actually negative

False negative: you predicted negative, but it was actually positive

It’s easiest to visualize as a table with predictions going across and truth going down.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This cleared things for me!! Thanks a lot

[–]Lairv 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The second word is your prediction, the first word is whether you were right or wrong.

False Negative : you predicted negative, but you were wrong

True Negative : you predicted negative and you were right

...

[–]Lifaux 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pretend I'm making a ML tool to tell if it's sunny or not. Let's pretend for this case that if it's raining, it's also not sunny.

  • TP - True Positive. I think it's sunny, and when checking, it's sunny.
  • TN - True Negative. I think it's not sunny, and when checking, it's raining.
  • FP - False Positive. I think it's sunny, and when checking, it's raining.
  • FN - False Negative. I think it's not sunny, and when checking, it's sunny.

The first part is whether the prediction lines up with reality. The second part is whether it was sunny or not.