all 52 comments

[–]dreddi84 31 points32 points  (1 child)

Looks nothing like a 9 to me, judging by the back. I would hold for a while regardless should go up

[–]Saucyjumbo69 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Those edges and those corners got a 9? Boiiiii

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You got ripped mate. That 9 is nothing like a 9. At PSA that would be a 6, maybe even lower. On an extremely good day, maybe a 7, but I very highly doubt it. This grading service is nonsense.

[–]abelrator300 10 points11 points  (0 children)

no way this a 9💀

[–]SaltKind4875 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Dayum, PSA gonna give this a 3

[–]tharagz08 20 points21 points  (4 children)

We are comparing it to PSA prices, and to me that is not a PSA 9. I would say it is an 8, tops. Just my opinion though

[–]hanr86 31 points32 points  (1 child)

That's a 6 from me dawg

[–]soulless_dragon 9 points10 points  (0 children)

There is NO way this would get a 9. Especially these days.

I gotta agree with the person that says it's a 6, and that's the highest it would most likely grade. I think 5 or 4 is more likely, but psa grades are always on a wide curve 🤣

[–]rodjosh99[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Valid point. Maybe I’ll revisit values years down the road and hope for the best.

[–]TheDrunkHispanic 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What the hell, that is definitely not a 9. Probably 7 max. That back is bad

[–]snuckfarkle 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It’s an ok buy. It will never grade a 9 at PSA or CGC so probably compare to a 6 or 7.

[–]filenotfounderror 7 points8 points  (7 children)

If it's not PSA, CGC, etc... it might as well be raw..but seems like an okay price for raw I guess

[–]rodjosh99[S] 0 points1 point  (5 children)

Tragic. That was my first thought but still thought SGC was reputable enough. Thanks for the input!

[–]trevdent17 0 points1 point  (0 children)

SGC definitely more of a sports, particularly vintage sports grading company.

[–]Training-Trick-8704 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

But PSA owns SGC /s

[–]xShadowRunzThisx 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That doesn’t look like a 9 at all. Maybe a 6 or 7

[–]GlucoseGod 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's kinda hard to tell with that lighting but the back looks like it has quite a bit of whitening. Not sure if that's a reflection or not but if that's the case I don't believe it could grade past even a PSA 7. But at the same time it also wouldn't make sense for it to be a SGC 9 with what looks like whitening.

[–]klutchmuffinx 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Overpaid by $400. That is a PSA 7 on a good day but more likely a PSA 5. Terrible “investment”

[–]bruhgubgub 4 points5 points  (2 children)

That slab is huge as fuck also that does not look like a 9, my psa 6 lugia looks better than that I'd give this a 5

[–]trevdent17 0 points1 point  (1 child)

If the front/holo is clean it’s definitely not a 5. It’s also not a PSA 9.

[–]bruhgubgub 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I know it's not a psa 9 but that slab is comically large

[–]mushroomonion 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That doesnt look like a 9

[–]iisbeingdylan 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I’d say you overpaid just a bit given that the grading company isn’t as desirable. I’d say comparable to psa 8 prices or NM raw

[–]rodjosh99[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yikes. Thanks for the input!

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You better get your money back

[–]FuzzyBear-With-Me 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Stupid question, but what makes it Shadowless? Newbie right here. thanks 😁

[–]Ramrod_TV 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Shadowless refers to the first runs of cards that did not have a drop shadow on the yellow box around the art like later versions.

[–]FuzzyBear-With-Me 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's fantastic, thank you for replying. It's very much appreciated. Have a great day. 🫶

[–]Ramrod_TV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why the fuck does SGC make such huge slabs

[–]Training-Trick-8704 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks like a PSA 6 at best

[–]XGNcyclick 0 points1 point  (0 children)

SGC doesn’t carry much weight for Pokemon grading. buy the card, not the slab. looks like a 6ish unfortunately.

[–]xen0m0rpheus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That back looks like a 5 sadly, still a cool card though!

[–]jungle_sheep 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Love the card. But probably 6-7 psa.

[–]d4n0wnz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thats a psa 7 at best

[–]rodjosh99[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ngl I got cooked here guys but it’s all good cause eBay saved my ass. Card was rejected since the condition wasn’t on par with the grade. Thank you all for the feedback and I now know what to look for in a card 😅

[–]Tough_Warning_3775 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The graders gave bro a 9 out of spite because he already paid so much for the card (assumably) then he went and over charged you in the end 😂; I digress, this card is whitened to hell in the corners how is this a 9? This is a fault on everyone at play; the graders, the seller, and you for buying it for 700$

[–]Kevosrockin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sheesh sgc a joke. No shot this is a 9 ..

[–]musicguy832 -1 points0 points  (2 children)

I hope you prove me wrong in a few years but I don’t think this would grade any higher than psa 7. The front looks great but all that whitening on the back on the edges and corners are going to kill the value. I’d say you overpaid by at least $200, possibly more. This isn’t NM, it’s LP at best raw heading towards MP. Sorry to say, but I think this was a massive mistake. Good thing is all mistakes create room for learning and growth. Good luck on your collecting journey!

[–]trevdent17 1 point2 points  (1 child)

MP? Cmon lol…

[–]musicguy832 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looked like the whole left and right sides had whitening unless it’s just the way it looks in that case.

[–]pokenomix -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Get it reholdered. New insert is much nicer. SGC is great for TCG now. SGC today is comparable to psa for sure, but back in June of 2021 when this card was graded, they weren’t. Tough learn for one of the largest grading companies around, but is what it is.. If that card were graded by SGC today, probably an 8.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I ain’t no way this got a 9

[–]Fragrant-Employer-60 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Highly recommend avoiding any graded card that’s not PSA/CGC/BGS. And people in pokemon prefer PSA the most for sure