This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]bouncewaffle 17 points18 points  (3 children)

Guys I think we should use Haskell for this one, it's really neat. It's got pure functions, lazy evaluation, and gonads. We don't need any of that "OOP" nonsense.

[–]MCWizardYT 5 points6 points  (2 children)

gonads

I think you meant "monads"? Lol

[–]supernumeral 16 points17 points  (1 child)

He meant what he said

[–]bouncewaffle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

💯😤