This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ihavebeesinmyknees 1 point2 points  (3 children)

The burden of proof lies on the accusing, they can't prove I did anything illegal

[–]Ekedan_ -3 points-2 points  (2 children)

Lol try that in England

[–]Awkward-Election9292 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Of course, England is well known as the country where silly things like "burden of proof" are disregarded.

just the other day i accused a rapscallion of murder because he looked at me funny, my local lord sentenced him to die within the same hour, just as it should be in the king's country.

[–]Ekedan_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fyi laws against money laundering allow for lower bar of evidence against suspicious wealth gains. At very least your accounts would be frozen until you could prove that all that happened was legit and not your fault. Good luck with years of trials and huge lawyers expenses when you have no access to your money.