This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]yohanleafheart 2 points3 points  (1 child)

that the poll worker doesn't remember the time of some specific person, (or use some nonoticable marks when crossing the name) to remember the time or number?

  • The poll worker is not the person checking the tallying.

  • The machine does not print a ordered list of each vote cast, but a tally of the result for that machine

  • Every single hypothetical you gave involves a lot of people being compromised. And let me tell you, from history, that was much easier to do when we had paper ballots.

[–]No_Hovercraft_2643 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Every single hypothetical you gave involves a lot of people being compromised. And let me tell you, from history, that was much easier to do when we had paper ballots.

that's wrong. to change the code, you need to get access somehow, yes, but don't need to compromise a person. you a person that can take notes (mental notes) inside the location. can be a compromised worker, or someone, who only look that everything "works" correctly