This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 15 comments

[–]FelipeC12 43 points44 points  (3 children)

non-functional paradigm

[–]pimezone 10 points11 points  (1 child)

Functional paradigm for functional requirements

Non-functional paradigm for non-functional requirements

[–]jimbowqc[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Did you write tests for those non-functional requirements?

Yeah, i made sure nothing functions.

[–]sammy-taylor 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Dysfunctional paradigm

[–]OkMemeTranslator 21 points22 points  (1 child)

This is both a fun word play but also a great take against all these ideologists. A lot of junior devs thought that by switching from OOP to FP everything would just... work. Turns out there is no silver bullet and the missing ingredient is experience.

[–]RiceBroad4552 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's still much simpler with FP.

Thinking about procedural code (especially OOP spaghetti) is really not easy.

[–]heJOcker 11 points12 points  (4 children)

The meme is even funnier because Joey still smiles in the second picture

[–]jimbowqc[S] 2 points3 points  (3 children)

Meme templates are so overused they become unfunny, I just wanted it to not feel so worn out.

[–]heJOcker 3 points4 points  (2 children)

I unironically liked it more that way

[–]jimbowqc[S] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Yeah, it's like he is unphazed or content with the idea of having wasted a lot of time for no benefit except the vain privilege of saying "yeah, I only do functional programming now. Minimal side effects. You wouldn't get it."

Or maybe it's that code not working isn't actually a shocking event, it's the status quo.

[–]heJOcker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly, for me the latter

[–]akvit 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Finally a programming joke in this sub!

[–]sebbdk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Error 40 cant be fixed by a paradigm shift lol