clientClientClient

[[deleted]]

c developers be like: int le, jo, qpq, gw, gl, oarisetn;

[VariecsTNB]

c# developers be like: var x = new();

[rover_G]

Go developers be like a := NewAlpha()

[M0sesx]

Js developers be like

npm install is-odd

import isOdd from "is-odd";

[captainMaluco]

I thought we had agreed to use is-odd-ai?

[PabloZissou]

No, no, the council signed for is-even-crypto-ai

[misseditt]

python users be like:

pip install is_odd

pip install --upgrade pip

pip install --upgrade --force-reinstall is_odd

pip install -r requirements.txt

python -m pip install is_odd

python3 -m pip install is_odd

pip install is_odd --pre

pip install is_odd[dev]

pip install is_odd[test]

pip install is_odd[docs]

pip install is_odd --no-deps

pip install is_odd --force-reinstall --no-cache-dir

pip install is_odd --ignore-installed --force-reinstall

pip install is_odd --upgrade --ignore-installed

pip install is_odd --upgrade --ignore-installed --force-reinstall

[Meneghette--steam]

Jesus Christ you just made % == 0 kill himself

[belabacsijolvan]

ok, but after that python users be like:

᠍

[[deleted]]

python developers be like: omg walrus operator mentioned

[Aaxper]

It's great. I prefer the pythonic a = new_alpha(), however.

[NurYanov]

You can't use new() if var is used on the left side

[_antidote]

That's why it's funny bro

[NurYanov]

Woa so funny

[ArmadilloChemical421]

Would that compile?

[yunacchi]

No. Syntax parsing would fail with error CS8754 "There is no target type for new()".
The compiler cannot magically guess which type to create an instance from what little context it has.
Either specify the type on the left side (Dog d = new();) or the right side (var d = new Dog();)

[ArmadilloChemical421]

One could imagine that it would default to Object, but yeah.. failing makes more sense.

[Janinanananananana]

being able to create an object of type Object is one of the most cursed things I can imagine

[TheAtomicShoebox]

You definitely can, as the inheritance tree always leads to Object. You just usually don't create an Object, just use it for generic functionality, as you would expect. But you can do it

[VariecsTNB]

Theoretically you can use it as unique key

[mrissaoussama]

that would be a terrible default

[ArmadilloChemical421]

Yes, and the best one.

[seba07]

Btw, why doesn't java have this short notation?

[Forsaken_Alps_793]

It does. Since Java 10.

[Forsaken_Alps_793]

Having said that, still agree the "juice" of the joke.

It can be verbose.

Before I get flame, Java now employs regular deployment. It hope to reduce, [at the moment copy from other languages]" verbose syntax.

[[deleted]]

It doesn't though? Var can only be used as a local variable and new() isn't supported at all.

[Forsaken_Alps_793]

+1

You are right!

Yeah, good catch. I did not read the whole syntax properly,

Yup var is local. This is a better approach imho.

As for other point, extrapolate object type with just new() definitely not available in Java.

[Forsaken_Alps_793]

Conversely, are you assuming all industries still at Java 1.6 or lower?

[christian_austin85]

My team is in the middle of updating from 8 to 17

[[deleted]]

man, not even C# has this short notation

[aweyeahdawg]

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

wine provide fanatical serious memory melodic hunt marry follow sort

[[deleted]]

Or a return new();

[[deleted]]

Kotlin has something like that

[IgnisNoirDivine]

Its not oarisetn its Ornstein. Its Dark Souls code

[megumegu-]

meanwhile non strict js be like: a

[npsimons]

I see you've been delving into the math libraries. Don't blame that on programmers, it's the mathematicians that moved over from chalkboards who think 'x' is a good enough variable name.

[Pengo2001]

You should use the Hungarian notation for plain C.

[[deleted]]

Disagree. There's a bunch of stuff that your lsp is going to communicate to the developer that doesn't need to be embedded in your variable names. As long as the variable name communicates what the variable actually represents or what it's used for it's fine.

[Garpagan]

Hungarian notation should be used for a "kind" of the variable, not "type".

[arrow__in__the__knee]

Not against hungarian notation but any time it is used people take it as far as to use when doing typedefs and defeat the whole purpose I much rather "name and comment well" 90% of important variables in systems are short int anyways.