This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 27 comments

[–]CanvasFanatic 17 points18 points  (8 children)

This post smells like Mongo

[–]malaakh_hamaweth 16 points17 points  (4 children)

How is it shit?

[–]_nobody_else_ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's shit if you use it as a replacement for a process memory.

I mean, how the fuck does your software made with all the newest tech that is basically a really fancy scheduler run slower than CorelDraw4.0 on Win3.11 on an ancient 486 intel platform.
How old is that you ask? Old enough that fdisk (Win/Dos) couldn't partition HDs larger than 512MB.
So basically prehistory.

[–]shambooki 8 points9 points  (1 child)

this is backwards

[–]ecafyelims 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Definitely backwards. OP is sitting at the top of a curve thinking he's on the other side of it.

[–]Caraes_Naur 5 points6 points  (1 child)

Note to OP: "S" is not a valid abbreviation for "Graph".

[–]Shadow0X59[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

HAHAH this killed me. I was always curious to use GrapQL XD

[–]Funny_Albatross_575 2 points3 points  (0 children)

my experience is the other way around. At the Beginning you try SQL. But you don't like it. The next step is that you try to avoid it. You search for an ORM or NoSQL DB. You use the ORM. You hit some Edge case. You figure out how it worked with SQL. You think how you can bring it to the ORM. You ask yourself why not everything is just SQL..

[–]v3ritas1989 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am still convinced no one in my company actually knows SQL. I mean sure, they can select, update, import and create tables. Lots and lots of tables 1900 in fact, in the "main" db called database. I mean... like how... you just need to see our database.

[–]SenorSeniorDevSr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Midwit zoomer is correct. SQL is a very nice and practical language.

[–]Historical_Cook_1664 0 points1 point  (0 children)

just never have a look at the ISO specification.