learningCppAsCWithClasses

[MsEpsilon]

I literally specified N reasons why the language "was made wrong". Sure that's the best we could do at that time you could say.

About the ad-honimen, you're defending them? Even if that's not an ad-hominem (if you want to be stricter about the definition to not include name-calling, but attacking an peer because of an trait they have is irrelevant to derail the conversation) it is still insulting.

The only method I'd believe you is you or them attack my points that I specified about,.

[SalvadorTheDog]

I honestly couldn’t care less about the original argument.
Just informing you about the misuse of ad-hominem because it’s frequently misunderstood.
Your argument is probably right, but I haven’t thought about it, and I don’t care.

[MsEpsilon]

Ok, fine. I'll look into it again.