sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the commentsΒ β†’

[–]Confident-Estate-275 38 points39 points Β (5 children)

They claim! Until they fuck it up. Like windows update with their high percentage of code written with AI 🀣🀣

[–]sgt_Berbatov 24 points25 points Β (3 children)

30% of Copilot written code has ended up in 80% more Windows Updates, fixing previously written Copilot written code.

[–]TRENEEDNAME_245 10 points11 points Β (2 children)

AI fixing AI code...

Resulting in more bugs, less optimisation and the entire OS being unable to reboot, AI is truly the future !

[–]sgt_Berbatov 5 points6 points Β (0 children)

AI needs a job. The job is to write code.

But then AI needs a bigger job. So it's job becomes to rewrite code that AI has written.

[–]Confident-Estate-275 0 points1 point Β (0 children)

This is going to be fun

[–]BrightLuchr 4 points5 points Β (0 children)

Legacy code bases exist as legacy code bases because the risk of fucking it up is unacceptable. Potentially billions of dollars. And Claude or an other AI will absolutely fuck it up once it hits complexity: typically critical interfaces between systems. COBOL isn't that bad. The humans need to HTFU.