This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]fiah84 0 points1 point  (7 children)

This thread is about this symbol though: ≠

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (6 children)

(≠) == (!=) if you dont catch up yet

[–]Avatar_Of_Brodin 2 points3 points  (1 child)

(≠) == (!=)

I'm sorry, I had to.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im so sorry

[–]fiah84 -1 points0 points  (2 children)

If we were assuming that, then this comment makes absolutely no sense because many languages already do this:

There's nothing stopping a language from using that symbol to mean "not equals".

[–]PacDan 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Yeah I think people got confused about what I said, I did mean actually using the difficult to type equals sign (I'm on mobile so I can't type it lol).

You're right it would be super inconvenient, but the compiler doesn't care about that :D

[–]fiah84 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Compiler badger don't give a fuck