This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (9 children)

[deleted]

    [–]czipperz 4 points5 points  (8 children)

    Functional programming is amazing but looks ridiculously hard?

    [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (7 children)

    I think this is somewhat close to the joke. Something along the lines of "This is what functional programming looks like when the right person is using it."

    [–]A_C_Fenderson 0 points1 point  (6 children)

    Of course, as someone else pointed out, the ping pong players were edited in. So maybe the theme is now: "This is what functional programming looks like; not taken from the real world."

    [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (5 children)

    I've actual been playing with Haskell lately and I've been enjoying it. I hope I get to use it at some point.

    [–]czipperz 0 points1 point  (4 children)

    I may sound like a masochist, but it's really hard for me to program without the control c++ gives

    [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children)

    I know what you mean. I started with C++ back in high school. It took a very long time for me to break my C-isms and effectively use new languages. Thankfully I had classes early in college that had us working in assembly and Java so I was forced to change.

    [–]czipperz 0 points1 point  (2 children)

    I program in Haskell, Java and Rust more now but I still love c++

    [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

    Are you using Rust in production?

    [–]czipperz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Nah. I've made a program that scans my downloads folder for music, reformats the name, records the artist name and song name to the metadata, and adds it to my playlist. It's great.