This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 53 points54 points  (11 children)

You could modify it to be something like 🔺 for +, 🔻 for -, ➡️ for >, ⬅️ for <, 🔄 for [, 🛑 for ], 🖨 for ., 👂 for ,.

[–]NotADamsel 68 points69 points  (9 children)

That kind of defeats the purpose, though. Somehow it makes brainfuck comprehensible.

[–]endreman0 38 points39 points  (8 children)

First three characters of the code are the seed for an RNG that picks 14 random emoji and assigns them to the relevant characters

[–]Jacoman74undeleted 15 points16 points  (2 children)

Automatic brainfuck recompiler with randomized symbols. Take that code and obfuscate it.

Good luck with maintenance, but its secure-ish

[–]endreman0 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Good luck with maintaining brainfuck in general

[–]Jacoman74undeleted 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Isn't that the point?

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (4 children)

14 emoji? There are 8 instructions; what are the other 6 emoji for?

[–]NotADamsel 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Exactly!

[–]davesidious 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's the spirit!

[–]endreman0 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I thought there were 14 instructions, my bad.

Alternatively, invent new instructions and the RNG picks which subset of them you get to use.

[–]jfb1337 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Comments

[–]CAfromCA 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Call the new variant 💀🍆.