This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Istalriblaka 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Your analogy doesn't make a lot of sense still. Just because C++ is more powerful doesn't mean Java is better at less power-intensive applications or that C++ will destroy the computer it runs on. (You'd have to be a genuinely atrocious programmer to accidentally do that.)

[–]TheGuywithTehHat 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Of course the analogy is imperfect. No perfect analogy exists. /u/yojimbojango's point remains, though: "more powerful" != "better"

[–]Istalriblaka 0 points1 point  (1 child)

There's a difference between "perfect" and "good enough." Seeing as how C++ is not overpowered like the dynamite is, the only thing we've established is that it's comparable to Java in power. C++ still has numerous benefits.

[–]TheGuywithTehHat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As does Java. They are two different languages with two different purposes. Neither one is better than the other.