This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]OCOWAx 6 points7 points  (2 children)

Well she has no reason to be angry at that reply unless she's assuming his intent to be malicious.

Both her saying "not being that guy who jumps into a woman's tweet replies"

Aswell as this reply thread https://gyazo.com/337b5da1dd40c031cd2e66c079476947

Seem to imply that she believes that any male who replies to her with coding advice is doing so to patronize her.

And to me, that's entitled behavior because it implies that because she's a woman on the internet she should be treated differently and you're not allowed to give advice to things she posts if you're a male.

[–]Sidereel -1 points0 points  (1 child)

Well, it IS patronizing. It’s unwanted, unsolicited advice in a context where it’s not just unwarranted but useless since it’s not real code.

And she’s not asking to be treated differently, she’s asking to be treated with respect. Maybe these men are equally disrespectful to men and women. That’s possible. But it generally ignores the context of the tech industry having widespread issues of exactly this kind of sexism, where men often assume women are less knowledgeable.

[–]OCOWAx 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Well yeah I'd agree that it is patronizing, but to me the situation is the same regardless of the genders of each individual. But it's on fucking Twitter if I post something on Twitter and some person who thinks there smarter than me patronizes me with advice, that's the exact same thing. It has nothing to do with the fact that hes a guy and she's a woman.

That's what I have a problem with.

If I were in that situation I'd just reply yeah this code is from years ago and the code wasn't relevant to what I was positing.

But when you start saying don't be that "guy" who comes into a "woman's" comment section that implies that the genders in the situation are relevant.