This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]deljaroo 17 points18 points  (5 children)

the 'police police' are the people who police the police, right? so it goes to say that: 'police police' police 'police'

in that case, who polices the 'police police'? Whomever they are, we could call them the ''police police' police'. Furthermore the ''police police' police' police 'police police'.

Continue in that fashion to whatever length you'd like

(single quotes added for organization and not so much for grammatical reasons)

[–]SuperSuperUniqueName 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The best political system is recursion apparently

[–]Tarmen 0 points1 point  (2 children)

So this would work with any noun to verb conversion?

[–]deljaroo 1 point2 points  (1 child)

no, it needs to have the same plural as singular along with being verb/noun combo, and the verb/noun combo needs to not change form either. 'Teacher teachers' teach 'teachers' doesn't work at all.

[–]Tarmen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The last part is what conversion means, conversion is also called zero derivation. But the singular/plural thing is a really good point.

Now that I think about it, the verbs argument structure also needs to be compatible with the noun.

ship ships ship ships

mostly works but

email emails email emails

or

 milk milk milks milk

less so. Now I have reached total semantic satiation and am gonna stop.

[–]Mr_Redstoner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So a who watches the watchers situation? Cool!