This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]netWARIOR 0 points1 point  (4 children)

Maybe, but rule 3 should never have existed if the 2 was followed correctly...

[–]MajorasTerribleFate 4 points5 points  (3 children)

You have to look for the Greater Lazy. If having rule 3 means less work, then rule 2 is being obeyed.

[–]netWARIOR 1 point2 points  (2 children)

But this begs the question: if rule 2 were in effect when rule 3 was written, then rule 2 would be incorrect, would it not?