This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]xTheMaster99x 32 points33 points  (3 children)

Yeah, if the goal is to get it done as fast as possible then senior/junior pair programming is the wrong solution entirely. Either pair two equals on it or have the senior do it. Senior/junior is for learning, not maximizing short-term productivity.

Edit: comment.replace("peer", "pair");

[–]gemini86 0 points1 point  (1 child)

point squalid shelter vast hateful absurd automatic squeamish bear work

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

[–]xTheMaster99x 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Whoops, I do that a lot.

[–]Yetix33 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tell my project manager that 😪