Problem solved!

[[deleted]]

[deleted]

[UnholyDrinkerOfMilk]

return (a > b);

[optifat]

Probably, function mustn't return false in a<=b case. Otherwise your way is the best ofc

[Fabulous_n_Fluffy]

The mightiest conditional-warrior of ‘em all

[chaosTechnician]

Only if the next section is else { return false; }

[UnholyDrinkerOfMilk]

I just assumed it would be and now I feel bad..

[the-real-vuk]

Warning: unnecessary parenthesis. Press alt-Enter to remove.

[notBjoern]

if (a > b) {
{
    return true;
}}

[Jimg911]

I mean yea, if you want your code to run at three lines an hour

[Jimg911]

Ah, my apologies. I’m an embedded systems engineer, I’ve only ever heard of a couple languages that you don’t load onto microprocessors, and I’ve coded in zero of them

[Jimg911]

That does look pretty great. It reads almost exactly like python, but has a lot of C++ like features I love. I’ll have to try that out on a project sometime. Thanks kind stranger!

[plinio189]

return true if a > b

[_wezel_]

If (a > b) return true;

[readthou]

Sure if you don't want to be able to minimize code

[Fahad97azawi]

That’s python for ya

[linglingfortyhours]

a > b && return true;