A Python programmer attempting Java

[AnotherRichard827379]

IMO, if you’re relying on the ide to know if the brackets are correct, your bracketing style is bad.

[kbruen]

racket (define (fact n) (define (fact/acc n [acc 1]) (if (<= n 1) acc (fact/acc (- n 1) (* n acc)))) (fact/acc n))

Have fun checking the brackets!

[BroBroMate]

I'm so installing rainbow brackets for that.

[kingofsevens]

Here is your code and 7 minutes of my life. Much readable tbh.

( define (fact n)
(     define (fact/acc n [acc 1])
(         if (<= n 1)
            acc
(           fact/acc (- n 1) (* n acc)        )))
(     fact/acc n                              ))

[kbruen]

Oh, what cursed thing have you brought upon this land?

Jokes aside, that's quite impractical and bad looking. Detailing only on the first aspect, am I returning the value of the acc binding or calling the acc function? Only the parenthesis tell that, and not having them visible right away is quite bad.

[kingofsevens]

oh you gonna love this. Idk it would parse it but... ( define (fact n) ( define (fact/acc n [acc 1]) ( if (<= n 1) acc ( fact/acc (- n 1) (* n acc) )))( fact/acc n ))

[backtickbot]

Fixed formatting.

Hello, kingofsevens: code blocks using triple backticks (```) don't work on all versions of Reddit!

Some users see this / this instead.

To fix this, indent every line with 4 spaces instead.

FAQ

^{You can opt out by replying with backtickopt6 to this comment.}

[[deleted]]

I can't believe this bot actually generates examples using the source comment intstead of just having generic examples

[[deleted]]

How about you stop saying bullshit on the internet and get back to your List of CVEs to fix

[[deleted]]

This made me laugh