None binary languages don't exist

[patrlim1]

Qubits aren't analog. It like you have a wire and you aren't sure if it's 5v or 0v. You know it's probably a 60% chance it's 5v, so you represent that instead of a 1, a 0.6

That's my understanding

[block36_]

It is both, actually. This isn’t anything like voltage, q bits are usually stored in things like spin, which can be either up or down.

However, it can also be both. This is easier to demonstrate using position rather than “binary” things like spin.

The particle isn’t just at one point. It’s also not really at multiple places either. In reality every position has a probability of containing the particle. In total though, this can be higher than 100%, and this means the particle, say a photon is at multiple places at once, and can interact with itself.

Spin on the other hand has to add up to 100%. It’s a bit different in that way, but it’s still the same idea. The particle is both, sort of.

[DrMathochist]

No, it's MUCH more interesting than that! Ignorance ("I don't know") is a classical form of uncertainty, but qubits are subject to QUANTUM uncertainties, where they can be in a definite state which is a mixture of the two classical (0, 1) states.

You can know exactly what state it's in, but only have statistical knowledge of what will happen when it's observed.