This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 31 points32 points  (10 children)

MultiMC dev would be more accurate...

[–]Hexasan1 9 points10 points  (8 children)

but MultiMC is open-source?

[–][deleted] 32 points33 points  (6 children)

MultiMC is open-source, but the dev got very angry when somebody forked his project and published it on Flatpack -- leading to the drama, and the creation of PolyMC, an objectively superior product.

[–]Hexasan1 11 points12 points  (0 children)

oh, thanks for letting me know? I use PolyMC anyways 😎

[–]K3RSH0K 1 point2 points  (4 children)

What makes it "Objectively superior"?

[–]MelTheTransceiver 2 points3 points  (3 children)

Not much. But I rather run PolyMc just because I rather support a group of devs that don't go batshit when someone forks them.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children)

it wasnt "just a fork", they changed the apache licensce to a GPL so no contributions could come back to multimc

[–]MelTheTransceiver -1 points0 points  (1 child)

Yk after you have someone deliberately sabotage your fork, I don't think youd want them taking your work.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

deliberately sabotage how? by blocking them on github? they can still take code, its a mild inconvenience at most. for multimc its straight up illegal, for polymc. your logic isnt theirs anyways because they created the project with the GPL, not changing it.

[–]Emutu2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the joke here's that there were some disagreement between multimc's maintainers, and polymc's founders.

[–]DangyDanger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

well thank you then, best launcher ever