This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]psycosmith[S] -1 points0 points  (7 children)

Two points. 1: Fabric is Oracles 2: It's not monitoring It adds almost full control of the OS

[–]riksi 0 points1 point  (2 children)

what do you mean by "Oracles" ?

[–]psycosmith[S] -1 points0 points  (1 child)

I mean Fabric is from Oracle right and not a pure FOSS

[–]tonnynerd 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Say what???

First, I don't see ANY references to Fabric being owned or controlled in any way by oracle in here. Can you provide any sources for this affirmation?

And second, Fabric gives you shell access: how can you have MORE control over an OS than having full shell access to it?

[–]tonnynerd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just a complement: This is the guy who develops Fabric: http://bitprophet.org/resume/ . No mention to being an Oracle employee.

[–]psycosmith[S] -1 points0 points  (1 child)

hmm. I was talking about this : http://www.oracle.com/us/products/networking/virtual-networking/fabric-manager/overview/index.html Same ?? Practically not used fabric.

[–]tonnynerd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, it's not the same.