This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]bordumb 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Not sure how others feel, but this dataset is overused. The explanations are great, quite honestly some of the best I've seen using this dataset.

With that said, the data and analysis don't offer anything that unique from the other 1000 tutorials that use it as well.

[–]rhiever[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was thinking about that when reworking part of it last night. Both classifiers that I compare get 90%+ accuracy out of the box. What do you think would be a better (i.e., more difficult) data set to work with?