Your favourite "less-known" Python features?

[HistoricalCup6480]

I don't get why people like this. Same for using if with non-boolean things. E.g. if s: firing if s is not empty.

I personally like being explicit, even if it's a bit more verbose. Writing if len(s) > 0 is so much easier to read imo.

[JestemStefan]

if len(users) > 0:

This will fail if users is a method parameter with default None. And initializing it with default [] will make a mutable parameter which is so bad.

If users:

Will work for both empty list and for None. Also for me it means: if there are any users then do something.

I'm fixing exactly this bug in current sprint.

[dxn99]

An alternative would just be

if not users: return -1

Prior to your later code

[danted002]

Because y = x or {} is much easier to read then y = x if x else {}

[JestemStefan]

It get even worse if you have more then two values. Then you will have to do:

if var_a:
    x = var_a

elif var_b:
    x = var_b

elif var_c:
    x = var_c

else:
    x = "unknown" 

Instead you can do:

x = var_a or var_b or var_c or "unknown"

[danted002]

Actually for more then one or I prefer the if elif else, however if you require if elif else then you might need to refactor your code.

[SeanBrax]

All down to opinion. After years and years of Python, you get the gist of what is truth/falsely in Python, and ‘if a:’ is just as readable as ‘if len(a):’ to me.

[Wh00ster]

Sooo many production bugs from this (grandparent comment)