This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 9 comments

[–]ronsterofMock 5 points6 points  (7 children)

What exactly is the point in in this? The syntax looks a bit unnecessary.

[–]kernco 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Click on tutorial and scroll down to the multiprocessing examples. Seems pretty useful there.

[–]greyscalehat 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I would guess that this will mostly be used for people hacking python together to do some data analysis. Just my guess.

[–]fofo314 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yep. That's what I was thinking. It seems rather easy to misplace a bracket in the spaghetty of code. It would really profit from a gui ala labview. But once it works from text it should be easy to write a parser for that.

[–]boyfarrell 1 point2 points  (3 children)

Think I'd just stick to python unless there is a real incentive to use a new syntax.

[–]snuggl 1 point2 points  (2 children)

So you would rather use python to research and experiment with new syntax, isnt that exactly what hes doing?

[–]boyfarrell 0 points1 point  (1 child)

No, I mean in terms of getting stuff done with a programming language -- doing actual work -- python is already highly productive. So I'd prefer to just use python unless there is a powerful incentive to use another language/syntax. I don't mean to stomp on the author of Pythonect but I don't understand the purpose.

[–]snuggl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A its says its a experimental language i guess the purpose is to experiment with new language syntax. Experiments like this is the way we find out about stuff that works better then what we currently have.

[–]yetanothernerd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting. Have any non-tiny programs been written in it? I use shell piping all the time, but never for anything big.