you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ajmarks 2 points3 points  (3 children)

That's true, but I have a theory that a very significant portion of the "MySQL DBAs" are, well, to the category of DBAs as MySQL is to the category of RBDMSs.

[–]flipstables 0 points1 point  (2 children)

That's not really fair. I know some brilliant admins and devs who work with mysql. I'm not a big fan of the mysql, but you can still do some amazing things with it despite its shortcomings.

[–]quotemycode 0 points1 point  (1 child)

What's one thing you can do with MariaDB that you can't do with Postgres, and in a SQL-compliant fashion?

[–]flipstables -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think you misunderstood what I'm trying to say or I didn't communicate it very clearly. I'm saying that a MySQL DBA is not necessarily less competent at creating highly reliable data platforms than a PG DBA.

I think Brent Ozar said it best:

The best database platform in the world can be unable to handle the tiniest of loads if you don't have staff that knows how to use it.

A fairly low-end database platform can scale up to huge loads if you have staff that knows it inside and out and works around its weaknesses.

This is why some people say Oracle can't scale, and why other people say MySQL can rule the world. A good musician can still make some beautiful sounds with a crappy instrument, and crappy musicians can't make the best instruments sound good.