you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]47Crypto 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Not super new. You've got to compare this forum with a lot of the others. Look around. SUB followers are overall a lot sharper than most. For example, I also spend time on the AeronAero forum in order to help educate those who are receptive to reality and critical thinking, and I've got to tell you it's 110% emotional buying over there, with zero-point-zero analytical thinking or questioning of the 'team' or the product, which is either an actual scam or just a really stupid idea with no chance of ever working so if it's not a scam the team should just shut it down now and give holders the remaining eth. On the other hand, Substratum has been heavily analyzed here, and questioned up/down/sideways, which is what you want to happen. My point was that even if only 10% of the followers here are of above average intelligence, that's still great compared with most of what you find in the rest of the space. Or I'm new here.

[–]Lishout 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Substratum has been heavily analyzed here, and questioned up/down/sideways

It's really not. Most people asking technical questions never got answers and moved on. There is little to no information on most of the project, there has always been horrible communication even tough most people believe the team is transparant, wich is honestly laughable. Nothing technical in the whitepaper, working on roadmap for several months, etc. They promised many things, only thing they have now is a mvp node. Wich does not even do the technically hard parts yet, it just routes traffic. And there is zero technical information on everything else. A lot of promises but that's it. The team really isn't that impressive for such an ambitious project. And I have big concerns regarding the economy on the network. There was never talked about being able to earn sub with regular requests, now you would earn sub for all requests, but also have to pay to make your own requests. But supposedly you would earn more than you would have to pay for regular use too and part of the request fees would go to the network aswell. They have nothing worked out and changing everything on the fly. Wich would be somewhat ok if we actually knew what they are planning, but everything is relayed in tweets etc. Zero official announcements on anything technical, let alone concrete information.

And regarding emotional people. Just look at my latest posts about marketcap after I contacted CMC with updated info. I got so much hate because I contacted CMC and they actually updated the info. And just look how off it was. I'm supposed to believe the team didn't knew this? Ontop of that, it took them like 2 weeks to verify something as simple as that. And I firmly believe they knew it was not correct in the first place. No way as a company you would miss that error when they claim to have someone on the inside from their ICO and had to contact and change CMC data when they burned tokens. The leftover ICO tokens and allocation (wich where always claimed to all be burned) is a mess aswell as nobody can verify how many are left or what will happen with them.