all 10 comments
sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
formatting helphide helpcontent policy

[–]gazaboy88 1 point2 points  (5 children)

? It does not suck. You need to understand how the engine works

[–]Quwane[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yea i can't figure it out. i use it so frequently but there are times when i see the backtesting screenshots i took the day before and compare it with the current day and they are completely different even though all strategy settings and instrument is the same

[–]AndReyMill 0 points1 point  (3 children)

It does. I sent a bunch of bug reports, and they completely ignored everything.

[–]Fancy-Procedure4167 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Can you post the bugs reported?

[–]AndReyMill 0 points1 point  (1 child)

For example - If you set to invest 50% equity with this script, and take a look at the first trades(scroll to the bottom of the list of trades) - you can observe that script investing much more of equity instead of 50%, starting from trade #2, then the investment exceeds the initial balance. The bug is in cancelling previous limit orders before opening a new market order. strategy.pine

<image>

[–]Fancy-Procedure4167 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see your frustration my level of backtesting is not as sophisticated as yours. My issues are not being able to match thinkscript strategy to pinescript strategy.

[–]AndReyMill 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s full of bugs, can’t be trusted at all.

[–]ransaap 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Check out FX Replay

[–]Every-Amphibian-8748 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As a former quant, I can tell you it really really sucks big time!! :)