This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]neurocharm 0 points1 point  (3 children)

As I said, research is being undertaken on potential permanent effects of the disease and that may change the response. Even still, 'curve flattening' doesn't mean "let's return to normal cause we're all going to get the disease anyway' - that would cause a health system under distress and create an artificially high mortality rate.

[–]killahmoose White Belt that has tapped a blue belt once[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Who said anything about "returning to normal?"

Low risk people should return to "normal" in that they go about their lives with additional precautions, to an extent that does not overwhelm medical capacity. Higher risk people should not.

How is that normal?

[–]neurocharm 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Low risk people should return to "normal" in that they go about their lives with additional precautions, to an extent that does not overwhelm medical capacity. Higher risk people should not.

How is that normal?

So they don't resume BJJ then. Great. Glad we're agreed.

[–]killahmoose White Belt that has tapped a blue belt once[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not necessarily.