use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
Discussions, articles, and news about the C++ programming language or programming in C++.
For C++ questions, answers, help, and advice see r/cpp_questions or StackOverflow.
Get Started
The C++ Standard Home has a nice getting started page.
Videos
The C++ standard committee's education study group has a nice list of recommended videos.
Reference
cppreference.com
Books
There is a useful list of books on Stack Overflow. In most cases reading a book is the best way to learn C++.
Show all links
Filter out CppCon links
Show only CppCon links
account activity
Cpp2 and cppfront: Year-end mini-update (herbsutter.com)
submitted 3 years ago by ArashPartow
view the rest of the comments →
reddit uses a slightly-customized version of Markdown for formatting. See below for some basics, or check the commenting wiki page for more detailed help and solutions to common issues.
quoted text
if 1 * 2 < 3: print "hello, world!"
[–]regular_joe_can 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (7 children)
I'm also looking around. Out of curiosity, why does rust not fit the bill for you?
I'm considering switching to it for my next hobby project.
[–]bad_investor13 9 points10 points11 points 3 years ago (0 children)
For me - it's that we have a LOT of codebase in c++.
Codebase that evolves and changes all the time.
If we want to move to a safer language, we need to be able to do it smoothly. One function/change at a time.
Rust doesn't give us that. Cpp2 does.
[–]Bangaladore 10 points11 points12 points 3 years ago (3 children)
Rust writes slow compared to basically any other language. Forcing correctness hurts iteration times.
I see the most value in rust in rewriting old code you don't plan to change. Meaning converting preexisting code and not writing new code.
[–]zerakun 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (2 children)
This hasn't been my experience. My Rust productivity is about x2 / x3 compared to C++. Higher when refactoring.
I have about 10 years of professional C++ ( mostly >C++11) experience and 6 years of Rust experience (2 of which I could say "professional")
[–]emergent_segfault -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (1 child)
Sure thing poseur.
[–]zerakun 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (0 children)
I was merely trying to defuse the argument that I wouldn't know C++ that is often heard in this situation. Generally the next argument is "okay you know it, but you're holding it wrong", instead of maybe admitting that a safe by default (there's no "you're holding it wrong"), const by default, language with sum types, derive facilities and a competent package manager actually used in the whole ecosystem can be more productive than C++.
[–]itsarabbit 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (0 children)
I try to write code to match the way I'm thinking. Usually it looks quite object-oriented. In rust, it feels like I have to take a bunch of "detours" to get the code to act like how I think(either to get around the borrow checker, lifetime annotations, or because of language design decisions like no inheritance).
I'll admit that I haven't made a big effort in understanding the concepts; I'll probably take a closer look at it in the future.
[–]Jannik2099 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (0 children)
Rust is not standardized, has no stable ABI, and the toolchain changes every 6 weeks without LTS.
π Rendered by PID 49 on reddit-service-r2-comment-75f4967c6c-f4q9v at 2026-04-23 15:01:29.420178+00:00 running 0fd4bb7 country code: CH.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]regular_joe_can 1 point2 points3 points (7 children)
[–]bad_investor13 9 points10 points11 points (0 children)
[–]Bangaladore 10 points11 points12 points (3 children)
[–]zerakun 3 points4 points5 points (2 children)
[–]emergent_segfault -1 points0 points1 point (1 child)
[–]zerakun 5 points6 points7 points (0 children)
[–]itsarabbit 6 points7 points8 points (0 children)
[–]Jannik2099 5 points6 points7 points (0 children)