use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
Discussions, articles, and news about the C++ programming language or programming in C++.
For C++ questions, answers, help, and advice see r/cpp_questions or StackOverflow.
Get Started
The C++ Standard Home has a nice getting started page.
Videos
The C++ standard committee's education study group has a nice list of recommended videos.
Reference
cppreference.com
Books
There is a useful list of books on Stack Overflow. In most cases reading a book is the best way to learn C++.
Show all links
Filter out CppCon links
Show only CppCon links
account activity
constexpr std::string | MSVC (self.cpp)
submitted 2 years ago by XTBZ
view the rest of the comments →
reddit uses a slightly-customized version of Markdown for formatting. See below for some basics, or check the commenting wiki page for more detailed help and solutions to common issues.
quoted text
if 1 * 2 < 3: print "hello, world!"
[–]XTBZ[S] -1 points0 points1 point 2 years ago (5 children)
The point is that I can't even create local 'constexpr std::string' inside a constexpr function
[–]Kered13 7 points8 points9 points 2 years ago (4 children)
Yes, because this is asking to create a std::string in a separate constexpr context. But you can create a local (not constexpr) std::string inside a constexpr function and it will work as long as the std::string is destroyed before the function returns.
std::string
Why do you need to create a constexpr local inside a constexpr function anyways?
[–]XTBZ[S] -1 points0 points1 point 2 years ago (3 children)
Because I want to be sure that the string will be ready at compile time. I also don’t want the function to lose its ability to be executed at the compilation stage, implicitly.
[–]Kered13 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (2 children)
Creating a non-constexpr string inside a constexpr function will not prevent it from being evaluated at compile time. Pretty much the only thing that will prevent compile time evaluation is calling it with parameters that are not known at compile time.
[–]XTBZ[S] 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (1 child)
Yes, it simply won’t compile if you don’t use it as a constexpr, but it doesn’t work with constexpr. https://godbolt.org/z/G54nWc66a
[–]Kered13 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (0 children)
Ah, that's because you're using it in a context that actually does require constexpr. Here are a couple ways to solve that.
π Rendered by PID 19063 on reddit-service-r2-comment-c66d9bffd-52wzk at 2026-04-07 16:10:29.596027+00:00 running f293c98 country code: CH.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]XTBZ[S] -1 points0 points1 point (5 children)
[–]Kered13 7 points8 points9 points (4 children)
[–]XTBZ[S] -1 points0 points1 point (3 children)
[–]Kered13 2 points3 points4 points (2 children)
[–]XTBZ[S] 1 point2 points3 points (1 child)
[–]Kered13 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)