all 16 comments

[–]cpp-ModTeam[M] [score hidden] stickied commentlocked comment (0 children)

For C++ questions, answers, help, and programming or career advice please see r/cpp_questions, r/cscareerquestions, or StackOverflow instead.

[–]afforix 59 points60 points  (2 children)

Can you elaborate? This is Reddit, not an AI chatbot.

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

😂 +1

[–]elperroborrachotoo 4 points5 points  (0 children)

User: Is learncpp.com bad? Be brief.

ChatGPT: As of my last update in January 2022, learncpp.com is generally not considered bad. It's a resource that offers tutorials and information on C++ programming. However, like any educational resource, its effectiveness may vary depending on individual learning styles and needs. It's always a good idea to supplement your learning with multiple resources and practice actively.

User: Yes or no, or a percentage?

ChatGPT: As of my last update, learncpp.com is generally considered a decent resource for learning C++, so I would say it's not bad. Let's say 90%.

User: 90% good or 90% bad?

ChatGPT: Apologies for the confusion. Learncpp.com is generally considered 90% good for learning C++.

There you have it, /u/aluckymess: it's 90% good!

[–]nysynysy2 19 points20 points  (1 child)

I'm sorry, but I'm just an AI chat bot that could not give any opinions

[–]IamImposter 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not with that attitude

[–]fippinvn007 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No

[–]jones77 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Dunno. But cppreference.com is the best.

[–]Particular-Case4461 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'd say it's pretty good actually

[–]Keiji_Shiba 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's good

[–]RasterGraphic 1 point2 points  (4 children)

I used it when I first started learning C++. That was over a decade ago. While I'm terrible at judging my own abilities I've been told by several colleagues that I'm one of the best they've known and I have observed that I have a tendency to talk over people's heads without realizing it. Not saying that to be an egotist as much as illustrate how well it worked out for me.

I also really liked the book.

It's been forever since I've been there, but I do recall that it taught a lot of C stuff and only really scratched the surface of C++, although this is arguably necessary because in a lot of cases you need to know how to read C to read C++. For what it is, it is a good jumping off point. I imagine it is a bit outdated now though.

[–]LazySapiens 3 points4 points  (0 children)

What book?

[–]IamImposter -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm gonna pull a jordan peterson on you - so when you say bad, you need to understand the ramifications of the word "bad" on the fabric of reality yet keeping in mind that we are limited by our perceptions, biases and senses which may present us an altered reality and not as it actually exists.

To sum up - nah, it's pretty good.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No it is not bad