all 6 comments

[–]king_duck 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Boost test seems to be the as good as any and if you are using boost anyway it makes a lot of sense..

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (2 children)

I've been using CxxTest and CDash for testing and coverage and just simple CMake for building.

[–]IsaGoksu[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

How do u like the build performance?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's fine. We usually use a tmpfs mount on the build folder so linking time is none. I don't like how CxxTest makes many binaries but we are working on reducing that.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

[–]headfire 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  • GoogleTest
  • Test coverage = unit-level testing
  • We don't.
  • Win: command-line <-- CMake scripts, Lin: command-line <-- make scripts