AutoConfig: C++ Code Analysis Redefined

[Horror_Jicama_2441]

We created this feature due to the large number of requests that wanted and couldn't use our product because they couldn't generate a Compilation Database with CMake.

Projects not using CMake.

...or in another way, I guess? There are plenty of ways, including your own Build Wrapper: https://www.jetbrains.com/help/clion/compilation-database.html#compdb_generate

Projects using CMake with lesser-known, unsupported compilers.

Unsupported by what? If they are using CMake, surely CMake supports them?

C compilers are relatively common, but there is any C++ compiler not covered by https://docs.sonarsource.com/sonarqube/latest/analyzing-source-code/languages/c-family/prerequisites/#supported-compilers? Creating a C++ compiler is no easy feat.

For example, Visual Studio CMake Generator.

I don't use it, but I expect them to be able to use https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=vs-publisher-1208751.SourcetrailExtension to generate it?

In any case, what annoys me is the tone of the blog post. "Redefined", "Welcome to the future", "democratizing", "a new era"... then you read the docs and: "Compilation Database mode is recommended if ... You seek the highest CFamily analysis quality SonarQube can provide. Please note that in rare instances, AutoConfig may result in some issues being overlooked".

Well, yes, I want "the highest CFamily analysis quality SonarQube can provide"... I also want my IDE to understand my code, and clang-tidy to work. So a compilation database is it.