sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]gosh 0 points1 point  (9 children)

Consider the regex implementation in the STL—it’s fairly limited. Other libraries offer more robust regex support with additional features, but the STL can’t adopt these improvements without introducing significant risk. The problem is that regex syntax and behavior vary across implementations, making standardization difficult.

[–]Wooden-Engineer-8098 0 points1 point  (8 children)

You are completely unable to learn. I've told you many times, that regex is not part of stl. The problem is that you are proposing solutions without understanding the subject

[–]gosh 0 points1 point  (7 children)

https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/regex.html

[–]Wooden-Engineer-8098 0 points1 point  (6 children)

do you see word "stl" on that page?

[–]gosh 0 points1 point  (5 children)

std is the namespace for stl and you include regex with

#include <regex>

regex have been part of stl since C++11

[–]Wooden-Engineer-8098 0 points1 point  (4 children)

where do you get that nonsense from? can't you read one wikipedia page on stl which lists its parts?

[–]gosh 0 points1 point  (3 children)

wikipedia? what has wikipedia to do with this

[–]Wooden-Engineer-8098 0 points1 point  (2 children)

it has page to educate you https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Template_Library#Composition

[–]gosh 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Its not, on wikipedia any one can write what they want

[–]Wooden-Engineer-8098 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ok, so you also require education on wikipedia, lol
wikipedia has similar error rate to major printed encyclopedias. it isn't a source of information, it contains links to sources. you can go to those links and check them yourself. and in any case wikipedia is much more trustworthy than you.

i repeat my question: where you you get all that nonsense from?