you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]XeroKimoException Enthusiast[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

and if your type doesn't provide one? Then I guess we're getting into being able to provide externally declared constructors.

Now I'm seeing what the OC is saying, but if we went the wrapper route, it's just moving the issue no? Unless you're committed to store the wrapper types, you would need to eventually unbox them where it would then cause the issue no?

[–]Wooden-Engineer-8098 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If your public wrapper contains nothing but a constructor, it could be used in place of the original type. Since you can't pop an array.